Member pathway
Shares, prepaid access and local contribution may support ownership and participation.
Shared assets, local capability and open learning could place beautiful infrastructure within reach of many more people. The figures below show where a public investment case might begin.
Imagined concept artwork
One proposed A$35,000 standard chamber, shared by more people: seven founders bring the equipment share to A$5,000 each; 35 members bring it to A$1,000 each.
The source table calls these changing amounts a “protocol cost at scale”. The visible calculation divides the hardware target. A separate A$500 operating fee per 60-day protocol, loan repayments and other local costs belong in the fuller access price.
Working proposalGetting started: the draft proposes an A$5,000 loan for each of seven founders. Together, those loans cover the A$35,000 chamber target. Its example models 7% interest over 36 months, or A$154.39 a month per founder.
Keeping it running: the draft lists A$500 per 60-day protocol for operations. It also imagines returning any co-operative surplus to members as rebates, which could help repay loans. Staffing, energy, insurance and professional care need their own local budget.
The source table repeats the A$5,000 loan in its later membership rows without showing how those later loan funds would be used. Each co-operative's finance plan would settle that detail before anyone treats the A$1,000 share as a complete access price. The A$35,000 target is for the proposed mass-produced chamber, not the bespoke Aura Geode.
The draft table's A$1,000 figure at 35 people matches A$35,000 divided by 35. These controls begin with the draft A$35,000 mass-produced chamber target. Change the people, asset target or direct capital support to explore another local arrangement. This result is an equipment share, not a full protocol quote: the A$500 proposed operating fee, loan terms and other running costs remain separate. The bespoke Aura Geode has no set price.
Editable illustrationA clear model keeps public value, member ownership, finance and everyday operation in separate currents. C-Hour recognises voluntary contribution without turning a person's time into a price.
Shares, prepaid access and local contribution may support ownership and participation.
Grants and guarantees may support access, research, resilience, evaluation and open learning.
Loans and service income sit beside realistic use, energy, maintenance and repayment assumptions.
Staffing, insurance, professional relationships, maintenance and governance remain visible year after year.
C-Hour connects food, movement, shared learning and preventative wellbeing with community contribution. Local groups may shape access to shared experiences through reciprocity. The hour remains a record of voluntary time, while equipment, professional care and operation have separate funding.
Local access, skills, resilience, shared ownership, open evidence and regional capability each tell a different part of the story.
500 Queens Venture Capital proposes women-led leadership and investment in useful enterprises, including care and shared infrastructure. Investment and paid work use financial accounts. C-Hour recognises voluntary participation in that wider life through its own non-monetary record.
The supplied papers imagine A$42.35 billion across 600,000 chambers, 600,000 saunas, 235,000 kiosks and wider regional supports. That far-horizon scenario could invite staged local pilots, transparent cost records and public evaluation before anyone considers a larger investment.
Far-horizon imagination