Choose a hypothetical site and document which environmental inputs are assumptions.

Subterranean City Designs
Explore underground space habitats through human needs, maintainable systems and site-specific questions.
Follow the connections. Choose your direction.
The need worth working on.
A subterranean city image can hide the daily realities of living without ordinary access to daylight, fresh air or a quick exit. The space-industry version also raises difficult questions about excavation, local materials and equipment failure. A useful concept must begin with people and a stated environment.
What the enterprise could offer.
Create a habitat design and simulation studio for an explicitly hypothetical off-world site. Compare a small underground module with a surface alternative, explaining what each option asks of construction, services and occupants. Use an accessible physical mock-up to test everyday layouts before technical claims.
People to build with
- Architecture and space habitat research teams
- Human-factors specialists exploring confined environments
- Design students connecting infrastructure with everyday life
A day in one proposed habitat module
Develop one room-scale module with routes for movement, maintenance and emergency access.
Build a non-occupied model or ordinary indoor mock-up.
Invite diverse adult participants to walk through daily tasks and identify exclusion or discomfort.
Review the proposed services and exits with appropriate engineering specialists.
The first result
A participant-reviewed layout, service map and list of site investigations required before engineering design.
What needs to be demonstrated.
Research frontier
The starting evidence
Layouts and human-factors questions can be explored on Earth; that does not establish an off-world construction method.
The open question
No site, subsurface survey, excavation process, structural design or life-support system is confirmed.
The next measurement
Record task access and maintenance reach in the mock-up, then identify which findings need environmental testing.
Build the means to deliver.
Useful capabilities and resources
- An architect and human-factors lead
- Engineering reviewers for structure and services
- An accessible mock-up space and paid participants
A possible business model
Proposed habitat studies, educational simulations and specialist design services before any construction undertaking.
A leadership decision to practise
Include people with varied sizes and mobility needs in the first layout review, with meaningful influence over the design.
People, consequences and decisions.
- Earth-based comfort findings may not transfer to the mission environment.
- Emergency access can conflict with efficient use of space.
- Excavation and maintenance assumptions can dominate feasibility.
If equality were being designed now...
- Would the habitat support privacy, care and movement for women of different bodies and ages?
- Who can reject a layout that looks efficient but makes daily life harder?
Begin with women's own experiences across bodies, ages, cultures and places. Invite disagreement and choose a practical change together.
Create a women-led design brief →Build your learning council.



Build alongside these ideas.
Break the underground-city vision into inspectable systems, human needs and decisions that can be tested.
Speculative concept
Design spacewear around the movement, fit and dignity of many different bodies.
Engineering development
Make radiation protection decisions traceable to an exposure scenario and evidence.
Research frontier
Investigate long-duration life support by measuring the limits of one resource loop.
Research frontier
Follow existing public concept work.
Explore possible futures for relationships, living systems, intelligence, movement, science and culture.
A public workbench connects ideas for housing, ageing, shared spaces, making, culture and community wealth.
From the original suggestion to a working brief.
Developed from original enterprise 78 in the 500 Queens VC NEW Long presentation (slide 17) and the planning document (page 8). This expanded brief is a proposed development path, not evidence of an operating venture or a confirmed partner.
Original title: Subterranean City Designs. The pilot, business model and learning connections on this page are proposed developments of that original idea.
