Tender fact
Tender snapshot
PDG-20842-1 asks for design-and-construct refurbishment of the Windemere Road Park skate bowl, including repair, new elements, ancillary works, certification and management plans.
OpenNot for construction / exploratory tender workspace
Exploratory tender dashboard
A practical workspace for understanding the Redland skate bowl tender, testing the partnership fit, and keeping the response pathway honest.
Decide clearly before the tender sprint.
This workspace turns the tender pack into a practical conversation tool for Luke, Paolo and Kieran. It supports a calm bid/no-bid decision, then a compliant response only if the partnership feels workable.
Exploratory
Not for construction
All rights reserved
Dashboard
New audit
Project Brief coverage
The first audit says the workspace covers the tender skeleton, but several Project Brief controls still need a stronger register or VFG/specialist confirmation.
OpenNew field evidence
Site visit record
The mandatory inspection was attended on 15 July 2026. Ten geotagged GoPro 360 captures now record the bowls, surfaces, fencing, shelter and surrounding park.
OpenSource imagery
Actual site photos
Appendix D photos are now included as web images so drainage, cracking, debris, shelter and fencing context can be reviewed directly.
OpenExploratory
Partnership status
Luke, Paolo and Kieran are testing fit. The workspace should help the team proceed, pause or no-bid respectfully.
OpenDecision point
Decision gate
Proceed only if VFG can lead the technical/design/build response and the specialist pathway is credible.
OpenNeeds VFG review
VFG capability fit
Public VFG material maps well to consulting, design, construction, maintenance, repairs and skatepark-specific delivery evidence.
OpenPossible role
Luke possible contribution
Tender narrative, information design, role clarity, local benefit framing, task tracking and concept drafting from supplied intent.
OpenOpen risk
Key tender risks
Certification pathway, BOQ/pricing, drainage, role boundaries, non-conforming returnables and contract risk need early attention.
OpenRegister
Open questions
Seed questions are ready for the site visit and can be edited in data/questions.json.
OpenTask board
Next actions
Review the site-visit evidence, capture VFG repair and concept notes, collect capability evidence, review the BOQ structure and decide whether the partnership should bid.
OpenKeep this clean
The public version is an organising layer, not the tender submission. Blank/source tender documents, actual site photos and VFG public images are included for context. Prices, signatures, private contact details, filled returnables and final tender material stay out of GitHub Pages unless the team agrees otherwise.